<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="podbean/3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: personal branding Irony: Democrats debate yet look the same!</title>
	<link>http://vik.podbean.com/2007/07/19/personal-branding-irony-democrats-debate-yet-look-the-same/</link>
	<description>How lawyers, accountants, &#038; financial advisors can practice marketing personal brands, within codes of ethics &#038; compliance.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://podbean.com/?v=3.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Vikram Rajan</title>
		<link>http://vik.podbean.com/2007/07/19/personal-branding-irony-democrats-debate-yet-look-the-same/#comment-43164</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 19:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://vik.podbean.com/2007/07/19/personal-branding-irony-democrats-debate-yet-look-the-same/#comment-43164</guid>
					<description>yes, I am partial to the big V too of course   ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, I am partial to the big V too of course   <img src='http://www.podbean.com/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> 
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: office with a view</title>
		<link>http://vik.podbean.com/2007/07/19/personal-branding-irony-democrats-debate-yet-look-the-same/#comment-43142</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 15:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://vik.podbean.com/2007/07/19/personal-branding-irony-democrats-debate-yet-look-the-same/#comment-43142</guid>
					<description>I am drawn to Vilsack's 'V'.  In a debate, 'V' would cream 'O'.  He may not be as refreshingly idealistic as 'O', but 'V' is ruthless and tenacious.  I'm still going to vote for 'O' though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am drawn to Vilsack&#8217;s &#8216;V&#8217;.  In a debate, &#8216;V&#8217; would cream &#8216;O&#8217;.  He may not be as refreshingly idealistic as &#8216;O&#8217;, but &#8216;V&#8217; is ruthless and tenacious.  I&#8217;m still going to vote for &#8216;O&#8217; though.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
