PRACTICE MARKETING blog

Tipping Point, by Malcolm Gladwell
Unleashing the Ideavirus, by Seth Godin
The Influentials, by Edward Keller and Jonathan Berry

The phrase 'Center of Influence' or COI is used often in sales & marketing, especially within the Insurance, investment, and financial services sector. Rather than marketing to them, we market through Influentials. Favoring the hub-and-spoke model, I agree with the strategy. It's its execution I question.

The phrase 'Center of Influence' or COI is used too often in sales & marketing, especially by financial advisors. Not every CPA is a COI. Not every advisor exhibits the same amount of Influence. In fact, how can we measure Influence anyways?

Influence presumes following: Thus, measure the followers - measure the Influence (sort of, close enough, and at least materially). [Sure, we can be 'moved' emotionally by Influence, not just physically. But we expect thought to lead to action - especially when it comes to marketing & sales.]

It's not always as easy as measuring followers of a blog, e-mail list, or LinkedIn 2nd degree reach (or twitter followers). The Centers of Influence in our off-line world must be 'measured' in less specific ways. (Besides, online following doesn't necessarily equate to off-line action.)

I like to synonymize COI as Group Leaders. That is, I ask my clients to list people who "lead groups: any type of group: professional/trade association, networking group, civic association, golf outings, charity dinners, etc."

While bureaucratic leaders may not wield the type of charismatic influence as we would want, at least they produce results. People show up, sit down, shut up, and listen... and spend money. Blunt; yet this is what we want our COI to do for us, eh? Those who 'lead ad hoc groups' showcase more charismatic influence than those leaders with titles. They naturally attract a crowd of listeners, fans, friends, etc.

Utilities like LinkedIn help us organize our database by Influence.